26 November
2006

Desire Lines

J taught me something yesterday. We went to Worcester to shop and have something to eat before going to the ballet and parked up in the car park towards Shrub Hill which is just by the canal. Its a relatively new car park and there's a path that runs from the bridge over the canal down onto the towpath that passes by at the lowest point and the most direct path to the road for the pedestrian. And its fenced off, there is no way round except by the planned entrance.

If it wasn't fenced off then there's no doubt that there would be a well worn, if muddy in the wet, path tramped by all the people that used their heads and worked out which was the best route for them.

In Planning these are called Desire Lines, the routes that people prefer over and above whatever it is that Planners would themselves prefer.

Which started me thinking as we trundled around Worcester how that applies to software and to the interfaces we allow people to use.


In the software I've written in the past and especially when I've been responsible for the interface I have explicitly included many routes through the interface. I've used menus, buttons on forms, keystrokes and toolbars to get to the same form, the same functionality from as many places as I could think of.

Sometimes those paths haven't been signified at all well and often some of the routes were suggested by users rather than myself after using the software and quite often I've found users navigating through software in ways that might seem to be less than optimal to myself but to them followed the internal map of the application that they'd formulated for themselves and which according to that map made it the most understandable route.

I can't claim any credit for doing this religiously, I follow my own Desire Lines in the creation of the software, I make well travelled paths that make sense to me. In designing interfaces, realising that other people have different Desire Lines even perhaps counter intuitive ones feels like it could be the difference between a well accepted application and one which is grudgingly used because it has some overriding requirement that makes using them necessary.

It feels as if making Desire Lines for individuals possible should make it easier for those individuals to fall in love with the application. At the same time signifying those Desire Lines could become very confusing in itself.

Falling in and out of love with products and applications is something I've been thinking a lot about recently.

Posted by theSliver at 11:38 | Comments (5)
<< And on the right... | Main | You are cordially invited... >>
Comments
Re: Desire Lines

'The Design of Everyday Things' has a really good section on the internal models people form when they use 'hidden' systems; not just software but also washing machines, central heating and so on. The book should be required reading for anyone who ever touches user-interface, but continued abundance of doors with handles is silly places suggests otherwise.

Indeed, I braved the Christmas crowds at the weekend and saw a classic example involving many people trying to cram through a large, slowly moving revolving door - the people passing through the door and the software controlling the IR sensors and motor were working in more or less direct opposition, because people's mental model of how to 'operate' revolving doors doesn't match what the progammers decided.

Posted by: James Turner at November 27,2006 12:27
Re: Desire Lines

You see it at Schipol (and the Tulip), with the single sweeping vane as well. The Design of Everyday Things is a brilliant book.

Posted by: theSliver at December 01,2006 12:14
Re: Desire Lines

Do you think there is a difference between desire lines and appropriation?

Desire lines sounds nicer :)

I quite like watching the way people use things in unanticipated ways but, with software or a website they can't actually make a new path through. I suppose in giving people lots of options you are anticipating their desired routes. Though - as one of my participants once said - 'Choice is a terrible thing!'

However, I do think most people would choose to push a door to make it go faster - especially when there is a crowd. Some things like that feel like they are over engineered 'coz we can'. No?




Posted by: Ivanka at December 01,2006 15:52
Re: Desire Lines

Hiya

i like the name 'desire lines' its cool better than wateva (cant remember alternative word)

Posted by: Siobhan at December 06,2006 19:41
Re: Desire Lines

Yes, the over engineering that says, if you feel pressure stop because you might be killing someone can't differentiate between that and 'just open faster'

I have seen software, even written some, which allows the user to make their own shortcuts, I suppoose its not exactly the same as treading a path but you can link steps and produce macros that give you that kind of feeling.

I suppose really its just scripting in the end. :-)

Siobhan: do you mean appropriation is the alternative? Which means taking over something for yourself, in every day objects that's more like decorating or changing the theme of things.

But its all cool :-)

Posted by: theSliver at December 07,2006 11:19